CMSimple_XH 1.6
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
What about calling it "jscript" ... as PSPad does.
Renaming seems to be a small and fast action, or?
Renaming seems to be a small and fast action, or?
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
cmb wrote:Originally I had js/ in mind, but back then this was not possible, because js/ would have been incorrectly recognized as second language folder.
How about "script"?
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
I forwarded the link to my webhosting provider's support staff. Thanks.cmb wrote:I've just added a PS to my former post, which most likely explains the issue.
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
I'm no hardliner regarding the proper name (which would be ECMAScript anyway), so jscript/ is fine by me, even if JScript was (or still is?) the name chosen by Microsoft's implementation.svasti wrote:What about calling it "jscript" ... as PSPad does.
Anyway, I'm still hoping to release 1.6.1 over the weekend, so we have to choose a new name soon.
+ 1uwes wrote:How about "script"?
Yes. However, the update patch will not be able to delete the old folder, so this will remain as zombie, if the user doesn't delete it manually.svasti wrote:Renaming seems to be a small and fast action, or?
Christoph M. Becker – Plugins for CMSimple_XH
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
This would be my main concern with that name.cmb wrote:even if JScript was (or still is?) the name chosen by Microsoft's implementation.
Those who have the redirect problem will delete the folder manually. For the others, it's not a big deal if they just don't care.cmb wrote:However, the update patch will not be able to delete the old folder, so this will remain as zombie, if the user doesn't delete it manually.
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
"jscripts" would be a good idea too (if I have a right in this kind of discussion). Maybe with an "howupgrade.txt" file to explain the manual deletion.
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Maybe this folder could be populated by more than one script in future. So why not call it "scripts" with a plural s at the end ... like pluginS, templateS, userfileS
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
I had written it in the plural too
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Well, the plural seems reasonable, as I assume there will be more scripts in the future. Oh well, svasti was faster.Bob wrote:"jscripts" would be a good idea too
Yes, of course! Everybody is welcome to join the discussion. If you want to participate in the voting, just say so. For sure, you fullfill the "terms of admission".Bob wrote:if I have a right in this kind of discussion
ACK. Maybe a prominent notice in the README files might suffice (plus a hint in the release announcements).Bob wrote:Maybe with an "howupgrade.txt" file to explain the manual deletion.
Christoph M. Becker – Plugins for CMSimple_XH
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
So it'll be "jscripts" or "scripts", I guess.